Where the JavaScript entries come from
256 entries, each exactly eight presses: ASCII at 0–127, 123 shortcuts at 128–250, and five commands at 251–255. No escape sequences. This encodes ordinary JavaScript, not a new language.
Shortcuts were ranked by frequency × characters saved in 275 permitted Doocs solution files; each occurs in at least three problem families. On 71 separate development files, optimal encoding takes 192,024 presses versus 292,152 for seven-bit ASCII (34.3% fewer). This measures error-free encoding, not human speed or correct problem solving.
Costs, source hashes and method · Pinned Doocs source
Where the Python entries come from
The same 256-entry layout, fitted separately on 1,831 permitted Python references. Each shortcut occurs in at least three training families. The fixed codebook never adapts while typing.
On 466 development files, optimal encoding takes 859,040 presses versus 1,570,219 for seven-bit ASCII (45.3% fewer). These previously explored splits are not fresh confirmation. No human typing improvement or global vocabulary optimum is established.
Costs, source hashes and method · Fitting tool